Bioethics : an anthology /
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Malden, MA ; Oxford :
Blackwell Pub.,
2006.
|
| Ausgabe: | 2nd ed. |
| Schriftenreihe: | Blackwell philosophy anthologies ;
25. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | Table of contents Contributor biographical information Publisher description |
Inhaltsangabe:
- Abortion and health care ethics
- Abortion and infanticide
- A Defense of abortion
- Why abortion is immoral
- Are pregnant women fetal containers?
- The McCaughey septuplets: God's will or human choice?
- Surrogate mothering: exploitation or empowerment?
- A Response to Purdy
- The Right to Lesbian parenthood
- Rights, interests, and possible people
- Genetics and reproductive risk: can having children be immoral?
- Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy
- Genetic technology: a threat to deafness
- Sex selection: the case for
- Conception to obtain hematopoietic stem cells
- Why we should not permit embryos to be selected as tissue donors
- The Moral status of the cloning of humans
- Questions about some uses of genetic engineering
- Ethical issues in manipulating the human germ line
- The Moral significance of the therapy-enhancement distinction in human genetics
- Should we undertake genetic research on intelligence?
- Lessons from a dark and distant past
- Patient autonomy and value-neutrality in nondirective genetic counseling
- Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future
- The Sanctity of life
- Declaration on euthanasia
- The Morality of killing: a traditional view
- Active and passive euthanasia
- Is killing no worse than letting die?
- Why killing is not always worse - and sometimes better - than letting die
- When care cannot cure: medical problems in seriously ill babies
- A Modern myth: that letting die is not the intentional causation of death
- The Abnormal child: moral dilemmas of doctors and parents
- Right to life of handicapped
- A Definition of irreversible coma
- Is the sanctity of life ethic terminally ill?
- Life past reason
- Dworkin on dementia: elegant theory, questionable policy
- The note
- When self-determination runs amok
- When abstract moralizing runs amok
- Listening and helping to die: the Dutch way
- Rescuing lives: can't we count?
- The Allocation of exotic medical lifesaving therapy
- Should alcoholics compete equally for liver transplantation? The Value of life
- How age should matter: justice as the basis for limiting care to the elderly
- Quality of life and resource allocation
- A Lifespan approach to health care
- Why give to strangers?
- Organ donation and retrieval: whose body is it anyway?
- The Case for allowing kidney sales
- The Survival lottery
- Ethics and clinical research
- Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research
- The Patient and the public good
- The Morality of clinical research: a case study
- Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries
- We're trying to help our sickest people, not exploit them
- Question of respect for life: what some [Australian] members of parliament have said about.
- embryonic stem cell research in parliament this week
- Stem cells, sex, and procreation
- Duties toward animals
- A Utilitarian view
- All animals are equal
- Vivisection, morals and medicine: an exchange
- Confidentiality in medicine: a decrepit concept
- On a supposed right to lie from altruistic motives
- Should doctors tell the truth?
- On telling patients the truth
- On liberty
- From Schloendorff v. New York Hospital
- Amputees by choice
- Abandoning informed consent
- Rational desires and the limitation of life-sustaining treatment
- The Doctor-patient relationship in different cultures
- Ethical dilemmas for nurses: physicans' orders versus patients' rights - In defense of the traditional nurse
- When philosophers shoot from the hip
- Ethics consultation as moral engagement
- Truth or consequences: the role of philosophers in policy-making
- Should the decisions of ethics communities be based on community values?